Politics

The Story of a City Garden

“I’ve learned that people will forget what you said, people will forget what you did, but people will never forget how you made them feel.”—Maya Angelou

By this point in time, the bulldozing of a community garden in Uptown Harrisburg about two weeks ago is widespread known. People inside and outside of the City have been pondering, debating, and shaking their heads about what happened. Jokes are being made and epithets are being coined.

There are assumptions and questions surrounding the whole thing, and as City Council President Wanda Williams herself said—the very person who ordered the demolition of the garden—there are many facts which are incorrect or unknown in this matter.

Some of the most important aspects of uncertainty have to do with the actual occurrence of demolition. How much did it cost? Where did the money come from? How did the City Council President get such an order granted by City staff? Did the Mayor really not give her approval for such an undertaking to occur?

These questions are serious to the fiscally distressed and severely disheartened City of Harrisburg. An urban community garden is demolished by the Public Works Highway Crew yet a resident can’t seem to find a way to get a rotting pile of abandoned furniture and garbage cleaned up.

As if that irony isn’t thick enough, there’s the question of legality, which is definitely what the City doesn’t need, more legal problems. Ask any attorney and the fact that the razing of the N6th Street Garden is a legal matter is unquestionable. The lack of due process usually is. The City of Harrisburg broke its contract with its lessee, knocked down private property without fair warning. The March 16th lease signed by the City’s Director of Building & Housing Development, Jack Robinson, clearly states that 30-day notice must be given to the lessee if the City intends to discontinue the lease agreement. Surely it’s fair to say the bulldozing and destruction of the garden was the City’s discontinuation of the lease as it was outlined—two lots to be used for a raised bed community garden for vegetables or flowers (see the agreement here).

This is a common practice in cities. Government-owned vacant lots are turned into community gardens. In some cases the government will manage the gardens and in other cases a non-profit group will be in charge. The N6th Street Garden was run by a non-profit group called the Green Urban Initiative (GUI). This group has been establishing community gardens in the City of Harrisburg for about four years, and the N6th Street Garden was the group’s fourth installation and its first in the Uptown district.

 

Unfortunately for this particular garden, ignorance has prevailed. Too many residents, including City Council members, are ignorant not only of what community gardening really is and of the rich benefits of urban garden projects, but more specifically of the City’s Adopt-A-Lot program, which enables such projects. “What is this program?” they ask incredulously as if it’s something being taken advantage of. The truth is, it’s a program not taken advantage of enough. For $1.00 a year, residents or organizations can lease a City-owned undeveloped lot for approved purposes. Purposes can be a raised bed garden, a sitting garden, a park, or any other creative, non-permanent, non-commercial endeavor. The concept behind the program is to institute a way for the public to help the City maintain its large number of vacant lots. These lots are not only a burden of maintenance to the City, but also are typically nuisances to neighbors. They become littered, overgrown, and neglected spaces in a neighborhood. The Adopt-A-Lot program seeks to improve conditions by sharing the responsibility with a willing party. The price is low at $1.00 because it is the lessee who takes on the responsibility, liability, and cost of maintenance of the lot, thereby relieving the City of the expenses. Cities such as Baltimore and Jersey City have similar programs.

As of August 2011 (the last time I accessed the list of available lots to adopt), there were about 35 vacant lots within three square blocks of GUI’s N3rd Street Garden located at 1629 N3rd Street. The N6th Street Garden is no different. The N6th Street Garden—made up of two lots—is located in the midst of at least 20 City-owned lots. The two lots assigned to GUI are located on a corner beside properties still under maintenance by the City, a row of vacantness the length of a block.

green urban initiative garden N6th Street bulldozed Wanda Williams

On April 28th, a group of volunteers erected about a dozen garden boxes. Amongst the volunteers were GUI members, non members, residents of the City, guests from outside, and neighbors of the garden itself. Yes, contrary to the outcry of the complainers and the unbeknownst of City Councilors, GUI reached out to people and organizations residing in the vicinity of the garden. GUI did survey the community and seek approval.

In fact, on April 4th representatives of GUI met with Pastor Willie Dixon of the Wesley Union AME Zion Church located at N5th and Curtin Streets; Jeremy Raff of Habitat for Humanity; Cindy Wagner and Lisa Williams of the Camp Curtin Crime Watch; resident Lewis Butts; and City representative, Kari Reagan. At that meeting, GUI presented the plan for the garden at N6th and Curtin Streets and it was unanimously supported. It was decided that the various attendees would work together to let residents of Uptown know about the soon-to-be community garden. After that April 4th meeting, a flyer was sent to each participant who had agreed to post and disseminate to spread the word and inform residents about the garden and about the availability of reserving a 10′x4′ garden box for $10.00.

Which takes us to another point of contention and ignorance in this garden story. Opposers to the N6th Street Garden have cited the $10.00 “rental” fee as a flaw of the garden, almost implying that GUI is attempting to make money off the endeavor since the lots are only leased from the City for $1.00 each. The reality is the $10.00 fee gets the gardener her or his own plot from March to October. And not only that, but GUI supplies tools, soil, and even seeds. The $10.00 is a buy-in, and a cheap one at that.  The $10.00 is a mark of commitment and ownership. A contribution to the cause. Of course, as GUI is quick to offer, if someone wants to garden but can’t pay the $10.00, that can be arranged. Certainly, GUI doesn’t make money off of gardeners. Being a non-profit organization, there’s no money to make. The fees collected go into the till that’s used for such things as purchasing the tools, soil, and seeds available to each gardener. Fees also go to purchasing garden building materials for new gardens and gardening maintenance for established ones. To maintain the N6th Street Garden properly, a City resident was hired to regularly mow the GUI lots.

One resident in particular was outraged with GUI for not mowing all of the lots on the block, the lots the City stewarded. Or at least the City was supposed to steward. In June, a woman who lived near the garden spoke at a City Council meeting at the Central Allison Hill Community Center. She said she was not at all happy with the N6th Street Garden because GUI wouldn’t mow the whole block. “I walked up to one of them and said ‘Are you going to mow all this?’ The gentleman told me they were only responsible for their lots. What about those other places? The grass is high. Why shouldn’t they just mow it, too?”

City Council President Wanda Williams told the woman. “Oh, don’t you worry. We know about that garden. We’re going to take care of that.”

And take care of it she did. Three months later, the garden was bulldozed at her command.

Wanda Williams’ comment in June wasn’t the first time she made a public remark in that vein. On May 8th, a little over a week after the N6th Street Garden was installed, the now infamous City resident Sylvia Rigal made a rare trip to City Council Chambers to complain about the new garden built beside her house. “No one came and asked me,” she said at the mic during public comments, emphasizing that was her insult over anything else. She made it clear she had already made phone calls to some of the City Councilors sitting before her, and Wanda Williams, Susan Brown Wilson, and Sandra Reid all nodded. As a matter of fact, Councilor Wilson and Councilor Reid announced they had already made phone calls to GUI. An onslaught against urban gardens ensued. Talk of rodents and filth. Williams declared she didn’t know about the Adopt-A-Lot program. “Something’s got to be done,” Wilson proclaimed. The Councilors’ disdain for the project was evident.

Afterwards, I approach Susan Brown Wilson and expressed my concerns about the tone that public conversation had taken. I told her there seemed to be a misunderstanding about the value of urban gardening, especially in a location like the N6th Street Garden in terms of improving quality of life, of integrating the Harrisburg community, of modeling hard work and harvest. I spoke of food deserts and of nutrition. In response, she agreed that there’s more than one perspective and that a more sophisticated conversation needed to happen. “We’re going to have a meeting between the Garden people and the residents.”

“Can I please attend?” I asked.

“Oh, it will be public. We’ll have a public meeting about this. We need to.”

That was May 8th. Throughout the summer, updates from GUI indicated no City Councilor had contacted any representative to schedule a meeting. The meeting never happened. When I asked representatives of GUI how the summer was going, the response was always the same—things were getting better. That is after a pile of wood to build boxes was stolen, colorfully painted wood done by children at Camp Curtin. Also, GUI was a bit disappointed that more people in the neighborhood weren’t signing up for lots, but that’s how many urban gardens are in their first year. The best advertisement is the garden itself. Each GUI garden—N3rd Street; Marion Street, Berryhill Street—has experienced such growing pains. Those growing pains always include buy-in, commitment, and maintenance (especially when vegetables and flowers look straggly quite quickly in the end of summer months as they begin to fade away for the season).

Growing pains. That’s probably the most significant lesson of gardening. Every season is a myriad of exercises in tolerance, patience, adaptation, surprise, perseverance, research, and trial and error. These are precisely the lessons the Harrisburg community needs.

Community. It’s that word that has resonated the most in the public complaint about the N6th Street Garden. Community. What does it mean and how are we each using it in the City of Harrisburg? The word community comes from the word common. Common ground. A place shared by any and all. A community is where fellowship is found.

That’s truly the opportunity missed in this whole story of a city garden. Residents were not brought together in fellowship. Residents were not put in the same place at the same time with arbitrators who understand the delicate nuances of the true issues at hand, issues our City of Harrisburg has been grimly struggling with amidst all of the other problems more willingly talked about. While undeniably we are a city drowning in debt, we are also a city drowning in tension, frustration, and vexation at otherness and difference. Too many of us in the City are existing in a realm of “us” and “them,” tainting our already hefty challenges with bigotry and prejudice.

The bulldozing of the N6th Street Garden epitomizes this. It epitomizes the misunderstandings, mis-impressions, mis-judgments, missed opportunities within the City of Harrisburg. The greatest missed opportunity is the meeting that never happened. The conversation that never occurred. The compromise never reached.

It’s a shame for residents. It’s a shame for City leaders.

The City Council President accused the N6th Street Garden of jeopardizing the welfare of residents. This is far from the truth. The truth is what is jeopardizing residents the most right now is the deliberate choking off of seeds of change and enterprise that are being cultivated where little else has grown but hostility and contempt. Rather than destroy the effort, we should be joining together, finding common ground, and watching the fruits of our labor evolve as it develops into what the City of Harrisburg can be—a perfect garden of variety and  sustenance. Let it grow, let us grow.

 

 

See Roxbury News videos:

For more reading on the subject of the City of Harrisburg’s divisions, see: Call It a City, It’ll Act Like a City

 

Share

12 Responses to “The Story of a City Garden”

  1. marie says:

    I have been waiting to read a more indepth and nuanced article about this issue and I knew it would be written by TLA, I also knew there would be a back story that PN would miss.

    I still don't understand the attitude of a few people and their sense of waiting for someone else to help them or their neighborhood while they watch.

  2. Rhonda says:

    Yes Tara. The saddest part of this whole episode is the missed opportunities for dialogue and finding common ground. Harrisburg has, sadly, become a place as you say of "otherness". Much education must been done throughout our neighborhoods and our city leaders must take the helm in that regard if we ever hope to become a "community" in the true sense of the word.

    Excellent article that was very much needed.

  3. Diane says:

    Some folks never learn. The Adopt-A-Lot program is an off-shoot of the S.U.R.E project (Sixth Street Uptown Revitalization Effort), which was one of the first Community Development Projects in the city of Harrisburg. It was a result of "REAL" Community Involvement supported by a "Tool Bank" which was housed in the Hudson Building, maintained by " the S.U.R.E. Project in collaboration with the City. The Board of Directors consisted of people like, William Burney, Harriet Braxton, Daryl Dean, and others who have since passed on. Wendall Banks, Roy Hansard were executive directors and Teddy Jefferson, was the first Community Organizer who have also passed on. I know because I was the Recreation Co-coordinator originally and later became the Community Organizer when the City, underhandedly remove Teddy and Wendell. Those lots were maintained by our crew who was lead by Tom Edrington. So yes, there is a destructive culture in the "City of Harrisburg" motivated by power and greed. There is a difference between the "church" as an institution and the people who attend them. There are people who live in those communities that never step foot in those churches and churches that want nothing to do with the people who live in the communities that surround them. There is no real leadership by design, only "sheeple", being led around by the smell of $$$.

    • Tara Leo Auchey says:

      Thank you for your post and information. Very interesting indeed. The more details and facts we citizens know about what has happened in our City, the better.

    • Rhonda says:

      I agree with you Diane, that the 6th St. Camp Curtin corridor is one of the first community development projects in the city. The people you mention, and a few others, were stalwarts of the community and tried very hard to make the development of this important and historic area work. I also agree that political posturing, manipulations meant to "reward" some and "punish" others, backdoor deals, greed, power grabs, and other negative activities has kept this area from flourishing in a similar manner as it's "sister" neighborhoods in midtown. That kind of thing goes back many years in the Camp Curtin corridor, as you imply.

      However, there is renewed interest in this area because of its historical significance and potential to be a vibrant, positive community. As Auchey points out, there is a lot of vacant land the city owns there that can be transformed into wonderful and positive usage. There are streets that are full of long time residents that care deeply about their homes and neighbors. But, I disagree that the churches do not care or want nothing to do with the communities that surround them. Many of the churches, including the Camp Curtin Memorial-Mitchell UMC of which I am a member, has been and will be deeply involved in the community. From the daily soup kitchen, to "Girls in the Spirit" which reaches out to pre-teens and teen girls, to NA/AA meetings, to chess clubs, ect. there is something for almost everyone going on there just about every day and/or night of the week. And, there is also a garden. A sitting garden to memorialize victims of gun violence in a beautiful and respectful setting that was planted and is maintained by a community volunteer. Other churches, such as Wesley AME and community volunteers partner with the church and other churches to reach out to the community in meaningful and effective ways. It is up to the community to take advantage of these opportunities. The 6th St. corridor is important to the history of Harrisburg as well as the Nation as it was a major encampment ground during the Civil War and integral to the success of the North. The beautiful Camp Curtin Memorial-Mitchell Church was built as a momument and testament to the importance of the corridor. The only thing standing in the way of this area being a model of urban rejuevenation and becoming a story of success, is the attitude of the people living within this community and the city leaders that can do something about it. The story of the destruction of the garden illustrates the issues and problems with successfully revitalizing this area over many years now. However, it can be done through open dialogue, community involvement, transparency, education, a spirit of cooperation and good-will.

      Sometimes change is hard to come by. Especially when minds of long-standing attitudes and outlooks born of hurt feelings, dashed dreams, and long held suspicions of ill-will are in the way. But change will happen. It always does when the common good of the community is at stake.

      • Diane says:

        I agree with you Rhonda. Camp Curtin Memorial was also a part of what we did. The church yard is the smallest state park in the country . It's not so much what is being done as to how its being done. There are ways of doing things that don't involve pitting people against one another. There has been a systematic destruction and purging of neighborhood institutions and leadership, exchange for cosmetic make-overs vs growth and sustainability. Again, like my grandmother use to say, "…its not what you do, its how you do it…" Many of these programs are designed for failure. There is nothing new here, it all basic. Much of what is taking place in Mid-town is also products of the SURE Project file cabinets, they just took the plans, brought in new faces and moved them and the money to other parts of the city. One Love.

        • Rhonda says:

          "There are ways of doing things that don't involve pitting people against one another."

          And with this quote we have the most important point of this conversation re the garden or any other issue we come across in this community. Thank you Diane, and I hope we cross paths and are able to work together in the future for the betterment of our community, if we have not already.

  4. Vince says:

    Surprised Council Prez Williams would give a Code Red w/o due process…we want answers!

    How can one obtain some of these vacant lots?

    • Tara Leo Auchey says:

      A point to note, last week, I did ask Wanda Williams where the money came from to demo the garden and she gave me a general answer about the City having a fund to maintain lots across the City. That's as specific as I got on that one with mere inquiry. To the Right to Knows.

      Secondly, I have the City's Adopt-A-Lot applications. When the City was more organized, Kari Reagan would supply interested residents/groups with a list of available lots. However, last August when I asked for an updated list, Ms. Reagan responded by telling me no list existed anymore. Rather if someone was interested in a particular lot, they are to contact her to see if it's on the list of City-owned Adopt-A-Lot properties. If you'd like the application and Ms. Reagan's contact, please send me an email: ttdHBG@todaysthedayhbg.com

  5. [...] On September 19th, a community garden was bulldozed at the command of the City Council President. It’s about more than an urban garden gone: today’s the day Harrisburg–The Story of a City Garden [...]

  6. charliecrystle says:

    I run Lancaster Community Gardens. I'm horrified by all of this, especially the attitudes. I'm happy to help in any way. You can find us at http://www.lancastercommunitygardens.com

  7. johan smith says:

    Since the times of developments in the antiquated times, people have been exploring different avenues regarding an assortment of manufacturing materials. Leaves, straws and mud were right around the ordinarily utilized building materials for building houses numerous centuries back. Before very long, individuals found the utilization of stone and wood in developing preferred living spots.

Leave a Reply